• Users Online: 204
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 21-26

Comparative evaluation of crestal bone level between alumina-blasted /acid –etched surface treated implant and calcium phosphate surface treated implant”- an in vivo study


1 Postgraduate Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Implantology, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India
2 Professor and HOD, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Implantology, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India
3 Sr. Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Implantology, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India
4 Sr. Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India
5 Senior Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Implantology, Government Dental College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Gattu Balram Pramod Kumar
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Implantology, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Telangana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijpcdr.ijpcdr_9_22

Rights and Permissions

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the crestal bone level between alumina-blasted/acid-etched (AB/AE) surface-treated implant and calcium phosphate surface-treated implant” based on the radiological examination. Materials and Methods: An in vivo study was undertaken to evaluate the crestal bone loss on mesial and distal aspects of implants categorized into two groups with different surface treatments, Group A: AB/AE surface-treated implant and Group B: calcium phosphate surface-treated implant using standardized intraoral periapical at three different intervals, i.e., immediately after implant placement, at the end of 3, and 6 months after placing the implants. Statistical tests used were Student's unpaired t-test and ANOVA. Results: The bone loss was measured, and values were recorded immediately after implant placement, 3, and 6 months of placement. Conclusions: The use of calcium phosphate surface-treated implants minimizes crestal bone loss compared to AB/AE. This may increase the longevity of implants.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed628    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded71    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal