International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2022  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 21--26

Comparative evaluation of crestal bone level between alumina-blasted /acid –etched surface treated implant and calcium phosphate surface treated implant”- an in vivo study


Gattu Balram Pramod Kumar1, A Kalyan Chakravarthy2, Nukalamarri Om Brahma Prasad Chary3, Kukutla Sai Amulya4, Kumbham Kiran Babu5, Deepika Poleypally1 
1 Postgraduate Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Implantology, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India
2 Professor and HOD, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Implantology, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India
3 Sr. Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Implantology, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India
4 Sr. Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India
5 Senior Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Implantology, Government Dental College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Gattu Balram Pramod Kumar
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Implantology, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Telangana
India

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the crestal bone level between alumina-blasted/acid-etched (AB/AE) surface-treated implant and calcium phosphate surface-treated implant” based on the radiological examination. Materials and Methods: An in vivo study was undertaken to evaluate the crestal bone loss on mesial and distal aspects of implants categorized into two groups with different surface treatments, Group A: AB/AE surface-treated implant and Group B: calcium phosphate surface-treated implant using standardized intraoral periapical at three different intervals, i.e., immediately after implant placement, at the end of 3, and 6 months after placing the implants. Statistical tests used were Student's unpaired t-test and ANOVA. Results: The bone loss was measured, and values were recorded immediately after implant placement, 3, and 6 months of placement. Conclusions: The use of calcium phosphate surface-treated implants minimizes crestal bone loss compared to AB/AE. This may increase the longevity of implants.


How to cite this article:
Kumar GB, Chakravarthy A K, Chary NO, Amulya KS, Babu KK, Poleypally D. Comparative evaluation of crestal bone level between alumina-blasted /acid –etched surface treated implant and calcium phosphate surface treated implant”- an in vivo study.Int J Prev Clin Dent Res 2022;9:21-26


How to cite this URL:
Kumar GB, Chakravarthy A K, Chary NO, Amulya KS, Babu KK, Poleypally D. Comparative evaluation of crestal bone level between alumina-blasted /acid –etched surface treated implant and calcium phosphate surface treated implant”- an in vivo study. Int J Prev Clin Dent Res [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 1 ];9:21-26
Available from: https://www.ijpcdr.org/article.asp?issn=2349-7319;year=2022;volume=9;issue=2;spage=21;epage=26;aulast=Kumar;type=0